Women's World Cup Saudi Arabia 2035

Jan 10, 2024

Saudi Arabia: The Largest Maximum Security Prison For Women Wants To Host The Women's World Cup In 2035. 

Let's start with how absurd it is for this country to host the Women's World Cup. As a woman and a fan, I am personally appalled, and as a women's rights activist, I am concerned. I am concerned not just for the female players but for the fans who will travel to see the event in Saudi Arabia. 


My concern stems from first-hand experience with the laws that govern women on the ground. Male guardianship is a law that requires every woman to have a man who will have the final say on the most basic aspects of her life until her death, no matter her age. Reema bint Bandar Al Saud came on TV and announced that Male Guardianship is over, followed by an announcement that the age of maturity for women is 21, the same age as it is for men. She used the word can a lot. A woman can now obtain a passport without her father's permission. A woman can travel without permission, and a woman can open a bank account without permission. A woman can… but she conveniently forgot to mention that a woman can also have those same new reforms denied to her by her male guardian. Under the new personal status law, which, instead of doing away with male guardianship, codified it and just gave it a new name. 


Regardless of age, a woman can be reported as a runaway by her male guardian. A woman can be stopped at the airport at the request of her guardian and sent straight to a holding cell or worse, the well-known Dar al-Reaya (The House of Care), which is a women's prison that was publicized as a shelter for abused women when in fact, it is nothing of the sort. Once picked up when reported by your guardian, you go nowhere unless your guardian signs you out. Even if that same guardian is the person who raped, beat, and abused you. 


I point all of this out to help you, the fans, and the players understand that although you might think this law does not apply to you, you would be wrong. As a woman entering a country where women have no rights, you too will have no equal rights once on Saudi soil. Even visitors have, as they are called, "sponsors." These sponsors have similar powers to guardians over their female wards. They can block you from leaving the country, keep your passport, and have you arrested. Your word will mean nothing as a foreigner and especially as a woman. It is a country where the courts are happy to work on hearsay and lock women, and especially activists, up with little to no evidence needed. All you need to do is upset the wrong person, and you will find yourself being asked to sign a confession in a police station that was drafted hours before you arrived. 


I would not have believed all this myself if I had not been an American citizen born to two American parents. I was laughed at by passport control and told I was not allowed to leave the country until my Saudi stepfather, my sponsor, and my guardian said I could. Remember that it's always easy to enter a prison, but it is much harder to get back out. 


We, as the fans and the players, need to stand firm that Saudi Arabia should not be allowed to host an event that represents and serves as a platform for creating female role models and breaking long-standing gender stereotypes. We must stand as role models for the strong Saudi women who are being silenced, trampled on, and denied their every human right by the Saudi Regime. They need our voices to say NO MORE. If you want the Women's World Cup, show us that you respect women, especially those of your own country, as much as we do.


Elise Evans Martin

Women’s Rights Activist | Called The Katniss Everdeen of Saudi Arabia.,

Speaker | Author | Proud Dissident of Saudi Arabia - Eliseevans.com

17 Jan, 2024
In the present day, I find myself passionately immersed in the world of football, especially as a devoted Brøndby fan. The journey through the tumultuous waters of club ownership has been nothing short of riveting, with our beloved club at the center of it all. As the global football landscape evolves, so do the dynamics of club ownership. Across the world, fans are witnessing their cherished clubs being bought and sold like commodities. It's a phenomenon that's impacting clubs of all sizes, from the biggest giants to the smaller, community-rooted teams. Take, for instance, the rise of mega-investors and oligarchs who see football clubs as attractive assets. Clubs are no longer just about local pride; they're now part of international investment portfolios. It's a trend that raises concerns about the soul of the sport. Are these new owners driven by a genuine love for the game and its traditions, or are they solely motivated by financial gain? In Brøndby, the "Bevar Brøndby" movement took root in response to this very question. They saw their beloved club, with its rich history and deep community ties, facing a crossroads. The fear was that the unique identity that made Brøndby IF special would be diluted or lost altogether. But this story isn't unique to Denmark. Around the world, fans are grappling with the same uncertainties. From the Premier League in England to La Liga in Spain, fans are questioning whether their clubs can maintain their local roots, traditions, and values in the face of corporate ownership. The heart of the issue lies in the tension between passion and profit. Football is more than just a business; it's a way of life for fans like me. It's the chants in the stands, the emotions on matchday, and the shared history that spans generations. It's the feeling of belonging to something bigger than ourselves. While I may not be on the frontlines of the "Bevar Brøndby" movement, I am an ardent supporter of their cause. I understand the importance of preserving the unique spirit of our club and ensuring that it remains a source of pride for the community. As I follow the developments in the world of football ownership, I can't help but feel a sense of urgency. The battle to protect our clubs' identities is ongoing, and the outcome will shape the future of the sport we hold dear. Whether it's in Denmark or elsewhere in the world, one thing remains clear: fans like me will continue to stand up for what we believe in, defending the soul of football against the forces of commercialization. Preserving Football's Heart: Germany's Unique '50+1 Rule' in Club Ownership In Germany, the landscape of football club ownership stands apart from many other countries, primarily due to the "50+1 rule." This rule has become a defining feature of German football and plays a crucial role in preserving the connection between clubs and their supporters. The "50+1 rule" stipulates that the majority of voting rights within a football club must be owned by its members, which are typically the fans. In practical terms, this means that the club's members must retain at least 50% of the voting rights, plus one additional vote. This regulation ensures that fans have a significant say in how their club is run, even when external investors come into play. This unique approach to ownership has several key implications: Fan Influence: The "50+1 rule" places a strong emphasis on fan influence within German football clubs. Fans are often organized into supporter associations that have a direct say in club decisions, including board elections, financial matters, and significant strategic choices. This direct fan involvement helps maintain a strong bond between the club and its supporters. Preventing Takeovers: The rule acts as a safeguard against hostile takeovers and excessive external influence. While investors can inject capital into clubs, they cannot control the club's destiny entirely. This ensures that the club remains grounded in its local community and retains its unique identity. Financial Stability: Clubs in Germany are generally seen as more financially stable compared to those in countries where foreign ownership is more common. The "50+1 rule" discourages risky financial behavior, as fans and members are motivated to maintain the club's long-term health rather than seeking immediate profit. Competitive Balance: The rule contributes to a relatively balanced competitive landscape in German football. Clubs with substantial external investment must still adhere to the rule, which helps maintain a sense of fairness and competition within the league. However, it's essential to note that the "50+1 rule" isn't without its critics. Some argue that it limits the financial resources available to clubs, making it challenging to compete with European football giants in terms of transfer fees and player salaries. Still, many fans and stakeholders view this limitation as a necessary trade-off to preserve the soul of German football. In summary, Germany's "50+1 rule" is a testament to the country's commitment to maintaining the traditional connection between football clubs and their fans. It's a model that ensures fan influence, financial stability, and competitive balance while fending off excessive external ownership and the risks it may bring. As football ownership evolves globally, Germany remains a unique and intriguing example of how clubs can remain firmly rooted in their communities. By Rasmus Augustesen
13 Jan, 2024
Se ignora a los hinchas. El régimen saudí escenifica maniobras publicitarias para desviar la atención de la opresión permanente
11 Jan, 2024
Supporters ignored. Saudi regime stages publicity stunts to deflect attention away from ongoing oppression
09 Jan, 2024
JOINT STATEMENT FROM NUFC FANS AGAINST SPORTSWASHING AND UNITED AGAINST SPORTSWASHING 
09 Jan, 2024
VISION, MISSION, AND STRATEGY FOR THE EUROPEAN "RECLAIM THE GAME" CAMPAIGN
Share by: