SPANISH SUPER CUP: SPANISH FOOTBALL’S CORRUPT DEAL WITH SAUDI DICTATORS

Jan 11, 2024

Supporters ignored. Saudi regime stages publicity stunts to deflect attention away from ongoing oppression

The Spanish Super Cup kicks off again this week and once again the new final-four format will be staged in the Saudi capital of Riyadh.



Last season’s Copa del Rey winners and runners-up (Real Madrid and Osasuna) will be joined by La Liga winners FC Barcelona and third placed Atletico Madrid as the four sides battle it out for the first official domestic silverware of the 2023-34 season.



No wonder the already super-rich figures who control Spanish football want their share of the Saudi pie. Human rights are not important when millions of euros are at stake.



On 11 September 2019, the RFEF (Spanish Football Federation) signed a contract with Saudi Arabia for €40 million to move the Spanish Super Cup there for the next six years, with a total value of €240 million to be shared between Federation, clubs and intermediary agency. In the contract signed with Sela, the Saudi public company, the Federation was guaranteed to receive 40 million euros for each edition, while Kosmos Holding - the company of Piqué (former FC Barcelona footballer) - gets four million euros for each of the six years signed.



This dirty deal was made without regard for football fans and has linked Spanish football to the despotic Saudi regime. It is yet another example of how Saudi dictators use football to divert attention from the many serious human rights violations.



Amnesty International criticised the decision to hold the competition in Saudi Arabia and accused the RFEF of “collaboration in this ‘whitewashing’ of the image of Saudi Arabia”, and said there had been very little improvement in the “the systematic abuse of homosexuals and continued discrimination against women.”



In 2022 the only player to speak out against taking the games to Saudi Arabia was Bilbao forward Rául García, when he focused his criticism on the inability to play in front of his team’s fans because the tournament is played thousands of kilometres away and is almost impossible for supporters to attend due to distance and cost. 



Cadena SER radio host Àngels Barceló, whose morning show is followed by nearly three million listeners in Spain, was more direct in his criticism of the decision to sell the rights of La Supa Copa to the Saudi dictatorship. He called the federation and the clubs hypocrites.



“No regime would pay millions of dollars for someone to come from aboard to change a regime that has no plans to change itself,” Barceló said. “Spanish soccer tarnishes itself with this competition, as do the teams that participate in it. Afterwards, they will all have more money in the bank, but from now on just don’t let them tell us about values and fair play.”




On the eve of this year’s Supa Copa, the Catalan Minister for Equality and Feminism, Tània Verge, criticised FC Barcelona's recommendations to fans who may travel to Riyadh. The club advised fans to avoid showing affection and demonstrations of support for the LGTBI collective.




For Verge, the decision of the former president of the RFEF, Luis Rubiales to take this competition to Saudi Arabia, "a country that does not respect LGBTI rights or those of women, has been, is and will be a disgrace to be reversed".



The Observatory against Homophobia (OCH) of Catalonia has also recorded its "absolute rejection" of FC Barcelona's decision to play the Super Cup in Saudi Arabia, a country that violates the rights and freedoms of women and LGTBI people. 



The RFEF is collaborating with the Saudi regime’s sportwashing project to deflect fan’s criticism of the decision to take the Super Cup to Saudi Arabia. The RFEF is currently participating in various events in Saudi Arabia.



Specifically, Spain’s coach Montse Tomé gave a training session to Saudi Arabian women's football coaches in Jeddah.



The next event will be at the semi-final between Barcelona and Osasuna, when women representing football in Arabia will be the protagonists of the so-called ‘Women's football’ box at the match.



There will also be a motivational talk by Olympic swimming champion Thais Hernandez.



These publicity stunts are used to cover the real situation facing Saudi women. In their recent report, ESOHR stated: “In 2023, women in Saudi Arabia faced arrests and arbitrary sentences amidst the continued prohibition of any activity and the prevention of activists from traveling and moving freely. In addition to the arrests of influential figures on social media and referrals to the specialized terrorism court for expressing their opinions, the organisation documented the arrest of women on retaliatory grounds and enforced disappearances of some of them. Furthermore, information confirmed that several detained women experienced mistreatment and torture.



Reclaim The Game supports the efforts of football supporters in the Spanish state to reverse this dirty, sportswashing deal between the RFEF and and the Saudi regime to bring the Super Cup back home.




John Hird - NUFC Fans Against Sportswashing






17 Jan, 2024
In the present day, I find myself passionately immersed in the world of football, especially as a devoted Brøndby fan. The journey through the tumultuous waters of club ownership has been nothing short of riveting, with our beloved club at the center of it all. As the global football landscape evolves, so do the dynamics of club ownership. Across the world, fans are witnessing their cherished clubs being bought and sold like commodities. It's a phenomenon that's impacting clubs of all sizes, from the biggest giants to the smaller, community-rooted teams. Take, for instance, the rise of mega-investors and oligarchs who see football clubs as attractive assets. Clubs are no longer just about local pride; they're now part of international investment portfolios. It's a trend that raises concerns about the soul of the sport. Are these new owners driven by a genuine love for the game and its traditions, or are they solely motivated by financial gain? In Brøndby, the "Bevar Brøndby" movement took root in response to this very question. They saw their beloved club, with its rich history and deep community ties, facing a crossroads. The fear was that the unique identity that made Brøndby IF special would be diluted or lost altogether. But this story isn't unique to Denmark. Around the world, fans are grappling with the same uncertainties. From the Premier League in England to La Liga in Spain, fans are questioning whether their clubs can maintain their local roots, traditions, and values in the face of corporate ownership. The heart of the issue lies in the tension between passion and profit. Football is more than just a business; it's a way of life for fans like me. It's the chants in the stands, the emotions on matchday, and the shared history that spans generations. It's the feeling of belonging to something bigger than ourselves. While I may not be on the frontlines of the "Bevar Brøndby" movement, I am an ardent supporter of their cause. I understand the importance of preserving the unique spirit of our club and ensuring that it remains a source of pride for the community. As I follow the developments in the world of football ownership, I can't help but feel a sense of urgency. The battle to protect our clubs' identities is ongoing, and the outcome will shape the future of the sport we hold dear. Whether it's in Denmark or elsewhere in the world, one thing remains clear: fans like me will continue to stand up for what we believe in, defending the soul of football against the forces of commercialization. Preserving Football's Heart: Germany's Unique '50+1 Rule' in Club Ownership In Germany, the landscape of football club ownership stands apart from many other countries, primarily due to the "50+1 rule." This rule has become a defining feature of German football and plays a crucial role in preserving the connection between clubs and their supporters. The "50+1 rule" stipulates that the majority of voting rights within a football club must be owned by its members, which are typically the fans. In practical terms, this means that the club's members must retain at least 50% of the voting rights, plus one additional vote. This regulation ensures that fans have a significant say in how their club is run, even when external investors come into play. This unique approach to ownership has several key implications: Fan Influence: The "50+1 rule" places a strong emphasis on fan influence within German football clubs. Fans are often organized into supporter associations that have a direct say in club decisions, including board elections, financial matters, and significant strategic choices. This direct fan involvement helps maintain a strong bond between the club and its supporters. Preventing Takeovers: The rule acts as a safeguard against hostile takeovers and excessive external influence. While investors can inject capital into clubs, they cannot control the club's destiny entirely. This ensures that the club remains grounded in its local community and retains its unique identity. Financial Stability: Clubs in Germany are generally seen as more financially stable compared to those in countries where foreign ownership is more common. The "50+1 rule" discourages risky financial behavior, as fans and members are motivated to maintain the club's long-term health rather than seeking immediate profit. Competitive Balance: The rule contributes to a relatively balanced competitive landscape in German football. Clubs with substantial external investment must still adhere to the rule, which helps maintain a sense of fairness and competition within the league. However, it's essential to note that the "50+1 rule" isn't without its critics. Some argue that it limits the financial resources available to clubs, making it challenging to compete with European football giants in terms of transfer fees and player salaries. Still, many fans and stakeholders view this limitation as a necessary trade-off to preserve the soul of German football. In summary, Germany's "50+1 rule" is a testament to the country's commitment to maintaining the traditional connection between football clubs and their fans. It's a model that ensures fan influence, financial stability, and competitive balance while fending off excessive external ownership and the risks it may bring. As football ownership evolves globally, Germany remains a unique and intriguing example of how clubs can remain firmly rooted in their communities. By Rasmus Augustesen
13 Jan, 2024
Se ignora a los hinchas. El régimen saudí escenifica maniobras publicitarias para desviar la atención de la opresión permanente
10 Jan, 2024
Saudi Arabia: The Largest Maximum Security Prison For Women Wants To Host The Women's World Cup In 2035.
09 Jan, 2024
JOINT STATEMENT FROM NUFC FANS AGAINST SPORTSWASHING AND UNITED AGAINST SPORTSWASHING 
09 Jan, 2024
VISION, MISSION, AND STRATEGY FOR THE EUROPEAN "RECLAIM THE GAME" CAMPAIGN
Share by: